John W. Hickenlooper US Inactive
HICKENLOOPER FOR COLORADO
John Hickenlooper: Fighting For Our Future
Ad copy
League of Conservation Voters lists Cory Gardner as one of their “Dirty Dozen”. They’ve endorsed John Hickenlooper because of his record making CO a leader in tackling climate change, including reducing methane emissions and joining the U.S. Climate Alliance.
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
Performance proxies
| Overall score | 53.0/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 53.9 · 90.1 · 5.5 · 62.5 |
| Spend range | USD 7,000–7,999 |
| Impressions | 350,000 – 399,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 20.0 |
| Est. audience size | 100,001 – 500,000 |
| Days live | 21 (2020-09-03 → 2020-09-24) |
| Created | 2020-09-03 |
| Creative variants | 1 body · 1 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | CO — John Hickenlooper |
| Surfaced by | “senate:John Hickenlooper” |
🧠 AI analysis
| Issue | energy environment |
| Framing | contrast comparison |
| Message type | persuasion |
| Emotional appeal | fear |
| Production tier | professional |
| Who pictured | candidate, opponent |
| Symbols | none |
| Call to action | learn more |
| Standout element | Split-screen design pairing a smiling Hickenlooper with an LCV endorsement badge against a darkened, red-X-overlaid image of Gardner |
| Tactic | The ad uses a classic contrast-comparison structure, leveraging third-party LCV credibility to elevate Hickenlooper while explicitly branding Gardner as part of the anti-environment 'Dirty Dozen,' driving urgency around climate stakes. |
Where it ran (delivery by region)
| Colorado | 100.0% |
Who saw it (delivery)
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 45-54 · female | 8.5% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 45-54 · male | 7.9% |
| 18-24 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 18-24 · female | 8.0% |
| 25-34 · female | 15.1% |
| 35-44 · female | 13.1% |
| 35-44 · male | 13.1% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 25-34 · male | 16.3% |
| 18-24 · male | 7.3% |
| 65+ · female | 2.8% |
| 55-64 · female | 2.3% |
| 65+ · male | 2.4% |
| 55-64 · male | 2.8% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.0% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.1% |
