Sarah Adlakha for US Senate US Inactive
SARAH ADLAKHA FOR SENATE
Fiscal Responsibility Should Mean Something
Ad copy
I thought we were the party of fiscal responsibility. Yet Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith voted against an amendment that would have cut ~$9 billion in federal spending at a time when our country is drowning in debt and struggling to care for its own citizens. I’m running against Cindy Hyde-Smith in the Republican primary on March 10th because Mississippi deserves consistent leadership and honest choices.
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
Performance proxies
| Overall score | 36.4/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 11.9 · 61.7 · 1.1 · 70.7 |
| Spend range | USD 100–199 |
| Impressions | 20,000 – 24,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 6.64 |
| Est. audience size | — |
| Days live | 5 (2026-01-31 → 2026-02-05) |
| Created | 2026-01-31 |
| Creative variants | 1 body · 1 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | MS — Sarah Adlakha |
| Surfaced by | “senate:Sarah Adlakha” |
🧠 AI analysis
| Issue | economy taxes |
| Framing | attack opponent |
| Message type | persuasion |
| Emotional appeal | anger |
| Production tier | diy amateur |
| Who pictured | candidate, opponent |
| Symbols | money cash |
| Call to action | learn more |
| Standout element | Yellow-circled 'Hyde-Smith (R-MS)' on a Senate NAY vote list overlaid on the candidate's face |
| Tactic | The ad uses a Republican-on-Republican attack strategy, leveraging a Senate vote record as damning receipts to expose Hyde-Smith as a hypocrite on fiscal responsibility, appealing directly to base conservative values in a primary. |
Where it ran (delivery by region)
| Mississippi | 100.0% |
Who saw it (delivery)
| 25-34 · female | 0.3% |
| 25-34 · male | 0.8% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 35-44 · female | 1.8% |
| 35-44 · male | 5.4% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 45-54 · female | 3.8% |
| 45-54 · male | 10.8% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 55-64 · female | 10.3% |
| 55-64 · male | 20.4% |
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 65+ · female | 20.7% |
| 65+ · male | 25.0% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.3% |
