COMMITTEE TO ELECT ALAN GRAYSON
Join Alan Grayson's campaign to Keep the Senate Blue
Alan Grayson will be a champion for working people in the Senate. In 2013-2017 alone, Congressman Grayson passed 121 laws through the House, more than any other Member of Congress. Here are some examples: Audit the Fed Amendment: Provides for an annual audit of the Federal Reserve. Amendment passed the House in 2010. Elderly housing amendment: increased funding for Housing for the Elderly by $2.5 million. Amendment passed the House in 2015. No Torture Amendment: Prohibits Torture. Amendment passed the House in 2013. And in 2009, Grayson’s first year in Congress, Grayson passed the landmark 'Pay for Performance Act,' which prohibited Wall Street banks from pocketing bailout money. Grayson’s bill passed the House in only nine days. With years of experience in the U.S. Congress, Alan is ready to beat Marco Rubio and deliver real progressive results. Are you with us? Donate today to help us build and grow this campaign.
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
| Overall score | 47.7/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 49.0 · 78.0 · 6.9 · 56.9 |
| Spend range | USD 4,500–4,999 |
| Impressions | 100,000 – 124,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 42.22 |
| Est. audience size | — |
| Days live | 26 (2022-04-26 → 2022-05-22) |
| Created | 2022-04-25 |
| Creative variants | 1 body · 1 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | FL — Alan Grayson |
| Surfaced by | “senate:Alan Grayson” |
| Issue | healthcare |
| Framing | contrast comparison |
| Message type | persuasion |
| Emotional appeal | anger |
| Production tier | semi pro |
| Who pictured | candidate, opponent |
| Symbols | none |
| Call to action | donate |
| Standout element | Side-by-side candidate comparison chart using party icons to contrast policy positions, framing Rubio's stances with deliberately provocative labels like 'Guns for Criminals' and 'Police Women's Bodies' |
| Tactic | Classic contrast-comparison tactic that reframes the opponent's positions in maximally negative language while elevating the candidate's own platform, leveraging populist issue ownership to drive both persuasion and donation conversion. |
| California | 15.7% |
| Florida | 9.4% |
| New York | 7.3% |
| Texas | 4.5% |
| Washington | 4.4% |
| Pennsylvania | 3.7% |
| Illinois | 3.7% |
| 13-17 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 35-44 · female | 4.1% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.6% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 25-34 · female | 2.0% |
| 65+ · male | 20.3% |
| 55-64 · female | 13.1% |
| 45-54 · female | 6.8% |
| 45-54 · male | 6.6% |
| 25-34 · male | 2.1% |
| 65+ · female | 27.5% |
| 13-17 · female | 0.0% |
| 55-64 · male | 11.2% |
| 35-44 · male | 4.0% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.4% |
| 18-24 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 18-24 · male | 0.3% |
| 13-17 · male | 0.0% |
| 18-24 · female | 0.3% |