PATRICK SCHMIDT FOR KANSAS
The senator, Roger Marshall, said Trump has to “take everything into consideration” if ceasefire progress stalls.
It is grossly irresponsible for Senator Marshall to casually suggest the potential use of a nuclear attack. Statements like his only escalate the situation, and it makes us less safe here at home, and further endangers members of our military. In this day and age, some politicians think it is ok to make flippant comments. Let’s be clear: talk of using a nuclear weapon is not a strength. It is not leadership. It is dangerous. Kansas families deserve a Senator who understands the weight of war, and the consequences of reckless rhetoric. If elected U.S. Senator, I will stand strong to protect our country and military from such reckless comments and actions. #kspolitics
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
| Overall score | 38.7/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 17.4 · 65.4 · 2.5 · 69.6 |
| Spend range | USD 200–299 |
| Impressions | 30,000 – 34,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 7.68 |
| Est. audience size | — |
| Days live | 10 (2026-04-27 → 2026-05-07) |
| Created | 2026-04-27 |
| Creative variants | 1 body · 1 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | KS — Patrick Schmidt |
| Surfaced by | “senate:Patrick Schmidt” |
| Issue | foreign policy defense |
| Framing | attack opponent |
| Message type | persuasion |
| Emotional appeal | fear |
| Production tier | semi pro |
| Who pictured | opponent |
| Symbols | military |
| Call to action | none |
| Standout element | Nameplate reading 'Hon. Roger Marshall' anchors the attack directly to the opponent mid-testimony |
| Tactic | The ad pairs damning ad copy with a news screenshot and real article headline to weaponize Marshall's own words against him, lending the attack credibility through third-party sourcing. |
| Kansas | 100.0% |
| 25-34 · female | 0.5% |
| 25-34 · male | 0.8% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 35-44 · female | 1.7% |
| 35-44 · male | 2.5% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 45-54 · female | 3.2% |
| 45-54 · male | 4.0% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 55-64 · female | 10.3% |
| 55-64 · male | 9.5% |
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 65+ · female | 39.3% |
| 65+ · male | 27.2% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.5% |