Mark Warner VA US Inactive
FRIENDS OF MARK WARNER
Reelect Mark Warner
Reelect Mark Warner
Chip in now >>>
Chip in now >>>
Ad copy
In my time in the Senate – maybe in my time in politics – there has been nothing as challenging, as bizarre, and as holy sugar as the second Trump administration. I'm holding Trump and every member of his dangerous administration accountable, but I can’t do it alone. Can you pitch in $5, $10, or whatever you can to protect this seat so I can keep up this fight in the Senate?
In my time in the Senate – maybe in my time in politics – there has been nothing as challenging, as bizarre, and as holy sugar as the second Trump administration. I'm holding Trump and every member of his dangerous administration accountable, but I can’t do it alone. Can you pitch in $5, $10, or whatever you can to protect this seat so I can keep up this fight in the Senate?
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
Performance proxies
| Overall score | 44.7/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 47.8 · 72.4 · 5.0 · 53.6 |
| Spend range | USD 4,000–4,499 |
| Impressions | 60,000 – 69,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 65.38 |
| Est. audience size | 100,001 – 500,000 |
| Days live | 19 (2026-01-13 → 2026-02-01) |
| Created | 2026-01-12 |
| Creative variants | 2 body · 2 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | VA — Mark Warner |
| Surfaced by | “senate:Mark Warner” |
🧠 AI analysis
| Issue | democracy elections |
| Framing | contrast comparison |
| Message type | fundraising |
| Emotional appeal | urgency |
| Production tier | semi pro |
| Who pictured | candidate |
| Symbols | none |
| Call to action | donate |
| Standout element | Senator Warner staring directly into camera with serious, determined expression conveying personal urgency |
| Tactic | Classic direct-to-camera fundraising appeal using personal accountability framing and low-dollar ask ladder to lower donation friction while positioning Warner as the lone fighter against a dangerous administration. |
Where it ran (delivery by region)
| Virginia | 100.0% |
Who saw it (delivery)
| 18-24 · female | 0.1% |
| 45-54 · male | 2.7% |
| 65+ · male | 16.7% |
| 65+ · female | 41.7% |
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.3% |
| 55-64 · male | 6.5% |
| 55-64 · female | 17.3% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 45-54 · female | 8.0% |
| 18-24 · male | 0.0% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 35-44 · male | 1.2% |
| 35-44 · female | 3.3% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 25-34 · male | 0.4% |
| 25-34 · female | 0.9% |
| 18-24 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.7% |
