JON OSSOFF FOR SENATE
Not the news we were hoping to share, but here it goes… Jon’s new "MAGA Warrior” opponent is outspending us on TV. The truth is, he’s a megamillionaire who already spent over $2 MILLION in ad buys and is planning to spend MILLIONS more of his own money to try and flip this Senate seat. The U.S. Senate race in Georgia isn’t just another election. It’s the one race MAGA is banking on. Because they know that if they beat Jon, they’ll hold the Senate. We need your help fighting back and stopping a MAGA takeover in Georgia. Can you rush a donation to help defend this seat?
FIRST: Cook Political Report said Jon Ossoff is the “most endangered incumbent” in the country. THEN: A self-proclaimed "MAGA Warrior" entered the Georgia Senate race. Since then, he has spent over $2 MILLION in ad buys and is outspending Jon on TV. NOW: Jon needs our help. This is a grassroots campaign that relies on thousands of small-dollar donors to build the resources we need to fight back and stop a MAGA takeover of Georgia. Can you rush a donation today?
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
| Overall score | 59.7/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 75.3 · 100.0 · 8.5 · 54.9 |
| Spend range | USD 50,000–59,999 |
| Impressions | 1,000,000 – 0 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 55.0 |
| Est. audience size | — |
| Days live | 32 (2025-08-25 → 2025-09-26) |
| Created | 2025-08-25 |
| Creative variants | 2 body · 2 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | GA — Jon Ossoff |
| Surfaced by | “senate:Jon Ossoff” |
| Issue | democracy elections |
| Framing | contrast comparison |
| Message type | fundraising |
| Emotional appeal | urgency |
| Production tier | professional |
| Who pictured | candidate |
| Symbols | none |
| Call to action | donate |
| Standout element | Ossoff in an olive shirt against a wooded background conveying grounded seriousness while copy frames an urgent money-gap threat |
| Tactic | Classic fundraising alarm tactic — framing the opponent's massive spending advantage as an existential threat to Senate control to trigger an emotional 'rush donation' response. |
| California | 16.3% |
| Georgia | 7.2% |
| New York | 7.1% |
| Florida | 5.6% |
| Texas | 5.2% |
| Massachusetts | 3.9% |
| Washington | 3.9% |
| 18-24 · female | 0.8% |
| 45-54 · male | 6.7% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.5% |
| 65+ · male | 13.5% |
| 65+ · female | 23.9% |
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 55-64 · male | 8.9% |
| 55-64 · female | 12.9% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 45-54 · female | 9.7% |
| 18-24 · male | 1.0% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 35-44 · male | 5.8% |
| 35-44 · female | 7.7% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 25-34 · male | 3.6% |
| 25-34 · female | 4.3% |
| 18-24 · unknown | 0.0% |
| Unknown · unknown | 0.0% |