Phillip Rench for Maine US Inactive
PHILLIP RENCH FOR US SENATE CAMPAIGN
Phillip Rench for US Senate
Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect the name, mailing address, occupation and name of employer of individuals whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle.
Ad copy
Being poor and lazy is not the same thing. This extended shutdown is both parties fault. Republicans passed an absurd "Big Beautiful Bill" that has raised the National Debt by over 2 trillion this year alone - which now sits at 38 TRILLION. This bill gave tax breaks to the wealthy, while simultaneously cutting funding to critical programs. Democrats are playing three card monte - meaning they do not have the leverage to get the concessions they want for health care. If they give up now, they will look even weaker. Who loses - All Americans. We deserve better representation in Washington, vote them all out.
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
Performance proxies
| Overall score | 32.2/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 11.9 · 51.9 · 1.4 · 63.5 |
| Spend range | USD 100–199 |
| Impressions | 8,000 – 8,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 17.59 |
| Est. audience size | — |
| Days live | 6 (2025-10-29 → 2025-11-04) |
| Created | 2025-10-29 |
| Creative variants | 1 body · 1 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | ME — Phillip Rench |
| Surfaced by | “senate:Phillip Rench” |
🧠 AI analysis
| Issue | economy taxes |
| Framing | contrast comparison |
| Message type | fundraising |
| Emotional appeal | anger |
| Production tier | semi pro |
| Who pictured | none |
| Symbols | farm rural |
| Call to action | donate |
| Standout element | hand-drawn moose logo evoking rustic Maine identity beneath a stark campaign wordmark |
| Tactic | The ad deploys a both-sides frustration frame — criticizing Republicans on debt and Democrats on strategy — to position the candidate as the commonsense independent alternative, driving urgency and donations. |
Where it ran (delivery by region)
| Maine | 100.0% |
Who saw it (delivery)
| 18-24 · female | 1.9% |
| 45-54 · male | 4.4% |
| 65+ · male | 19.9% |
| 65+ · female | 26.5% |
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 55-64 · male | 6.9% |
| 55-64 · female | 8.0% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 45-54 · female | 3.4% |
| 18-24 · male | 6.0% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.3% |
| 35-44 · male | 6.8% |
| 35-44 · female | 3.7% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.5% |
| 25-34 · male | 7.3% |
| 25-34 · female | 3.4% |
| 18-24 · unknown | 0.3% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.6% |
