John Fleming - Candidate for Charlotte Co. Commissioner, District 2 US Inactive
John Fleming - Candidate for Charlotte Co. Commissioner, District 2
Debate on water and wastewater fees in Charlotte County
Charlotte County builders will now pay sharply higher water and wastewater connection fees starting April 1, following a controversial debate on infrastructure funding.
Ad copy
"Fleming, who is running against Commissioner Chris Constance in this year’s election, has repeatedly criticized the county’s approach to growth management....has told commissioners that residential development w/o corresponding increases in fees would eventually lead to higher costs for residents." Here is good article about the Tuesday meeting...MORE INSIGHTS COMING SOON!
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
Performance proxies
| Overall score | 25.8/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 0.0 · 39.6 · 1.1 · 62.6 |
| Spend range | <USD 99 |
| Impressions | 2,000 – 2,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 19.8 |
| Est. audience size | 100,001 – 500,000 |
| Days live | 5 (2026-01-15 → 2026-01-20) |
| Created | 2026-01-15 |
| Creative variants | 1 body · 1 headline |
| Platforms | |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | LA — John Fleming |
| Surfaced by | “senate:John Fleming” |
🧠 AI analysis
| Issue | housing |
| Framing | contrast comparison |
| Message type | awareness |
| Emotional appeal | urgency |
| Production tier | diy amateur |
| Who pictured | candidate |
| Symbols | capitol statue, none |
| Call to action | none |
| Standout element | News article screenshot with 'IN GOD WE TRUST' sign visible on county commission dais lending institutional legitimacy |
| Tactic | The ad borrows credibility from a local business news outlet to validate the candidate's policy critique of the incumbent, positioning Fleming as a fiscally responsible watchdog on growth management fees. |
Where it ran (delivery by region)
| Florida | 100.0% |
Who saw it (delivery)
| 18-24 · female | 0.4% |
| 18-24 · male | 1.0% |
| 25-34 · female | 0.8% |
| 25-34 · male | 2.2% |
| 35-44 · female | 1.6% |
| 35-44 · male | 4.2% |
| 45-54 · female | 3.7% |
| 45-54 · male | 5.2% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 55-64 · female | 11.4% |
| 55-64 · male | 13.0% |
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 65+ · female | 26.1% |
| 65+ · male | 29.5% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.7% |
