David Roth for Idaho US Inactive
The Committee to Elect David Roth
Why Do Republicans Hate Education Standards?
Roth for Growth, Putting Idaho First!
Ad copy
My latest blog post about something I am especially concerned about. I hope that you will take a look.
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
Performance proxies
| Overall score | 23.5/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 0.0 · 34.4 · 0.8 · 58.7 |
| Spend range | <USD 99 |
| Impressions | 1,000 – 1,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 33.01 |
| Est. audience size | 10,001 – 50,000 |
| Days live | 4 (2020-04-21 → 2020-04-25) |
| Created | 2020-04-21 |
| Creative variants | 1 body · 1 headline |
| Platforms | |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | ID — David Roth |
| Surfaced by | “senate:David Roth” |
🧠 AI analysis
| Issue | education |
| Framing | attack opponent |
| Message type | awareness |
| Emotional appeal | anger |
| Production tier | diy amateur |
| Who pictured | none |
| Symbols | none |
| Call to action | learn more |
| Standout element | Idaho state outline used as campaign logo graphic with district number 33B |
| Tactic | Uses a provocative rhetorical question attacking Republicans on education to drive blog traffic, relying on issue framing rather than polished visuals. |
Where it ran (delivery by region)
| Idaho | 100.0% |
Who saw it (delivery)
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 25-34 · female | 9.8% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 18-24 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 65+ · male | 3.8% |
| 65+ · female | 10.5% |
| 45-54 · female | 14.0% |
| 18-24 · male | 2.9% |
| 18-24 · female | 4.0% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 25-34 · male | 5.1% |
| 55-64 · female | 11.2% |
| 35-44 · male | 9.2% |
| 35-44 · female | 17.8% |
| 55-64 · male | 4.6% |
| 45-54 · male | 6.2% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.2% |
