Pamela Goynes-Brown US Inactive
Pamela Goynes-Brown for Mayor
Vote Goynes-Brown For Mayor
Elect Goynes-Brown
Elect Goynes-Brown
Ad copy
The Las Vegas Review-Journal and Las Vegas Sun RARELY agree, but in the race for North Las Vegas Mayor, both papers strongly endorse Pamela Goynes-Brown. They share her priorities of safe communities, a sound economy and smart growth.
The Las Vegas Review-Journal and Las Vegas Sun RARELY agree, but in the race for North Las Vegas Mayor, both papers strongly endorse Pamela Goynes-Brown. They share her priorities of safe communities, a sound economy and smart growth.
The Las Vegas Review-Journal and Las Vegas Sun RARELY agree, but in the race for North Las Vegas Mayor, both papers strongly endorse Pamela Goynes-Brown. They share her priorities of safe communities, a sound economy and smart growth.
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
Performance proxies
| Overall score | 43.1/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 31.7 · 72.4 · 3.6 · 64.8 |
| Spend range | USD 900–999 |
| Impressions | 60,000 – 69,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 14.61 |
| Est. audience size | 100,001 – 500,000 |
| Days live | 14 (2022-10-26 → 2022-11-09) |
| Created | 2022-10-25 |
| Creative variants | 3 body · 3 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | VA — Pamela Brown |
| Surfaced by | “senate:Pamela Brown” |
🧠 AI analysis
| Issue | other |
| Framing | positive candidate |
| Message type | persuasion |
| Emotional appeal | pride |
| Production tier | semi pro |
| Who pictured | candidate |
| Symbols | none |
| Call to action | vote |
| Standout element | Dual rival newspaper endorsement logos displayed side-by-side as credibility anchors |
| Tactic | The ad leverages rare bipartisan media consensus — two ideologically opposed papers both endorsing — to signal broad cross-spectrum legitimacy and build trust with undecided voters. |
Where it ran (delivery by region)
| Nevada | 99.3% |
| Arizona | 0.5% |
| California | 0.1% |
| Florida | 0.0% |
| Utah | 0.0% |
| Texas | 0.0% |
| Washington | 0.0% |
Who saw it (delivery)
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 65+ · female | 3.5% |
| 65+ · male | 2.2% |
| 45-54 · male | 4.4% |
| 35-44 · male | 8.7% |
| 25-34 · female | 30.4% |
| 35-44 · female | 14.5% |
| 25-34 · male | 20.7% |
| 55-64 · female | 4.6% |
| 55-64 · male | 2.5% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.3% |
| 45-54 · female | 7.7% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.0% |
