Jade Simmons US Inactive
CITIZENS FOR JADE SIMMONS
Operation Restoration 2020
Operation Restoration believes in the power of a unified nation. We exist because of our current political system’s inability to put the American people before party loyalties, and its tendency to deny the truth in defense of keeping power.
Ad copy
If this week's debate made you sick or made you feel hopeless, don't settle! There is another viable option! Jade Simmons has a mandate to serve as many people as possible and is a leader that can and will say the hard things in love, but is unifying and able to find common ground solutions. Vote for Jade Simmons for U.S. President in 2020! 🇺🇸 operationrestoration2020.com 🇺🇸 #presidentialdebate #votejade #knowALLofyouroptions
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
Performance proxies
| Overall score | 27.2/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 0.0 · 43.0 · 0.8 · 65.1 |
| Spend range | <USD 99 |
| Impressions | 3,000 – 3,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 14.14 |
| Est. audience size | — |
| Days live | 4 (2020-10-01 → 2020-10-05) |
| Created | 2020-10-01 |
| Creative variants | 1 body · 1 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | TX — Jade Simmons |
| Surfaced by | “senate:Jade Simmons” |
🧠 AI analysis
| Issue | candidate character bio |
| Framing | positive candidate |
| Message type | persuasion |
| Emotional appeal | hope |
| Production tier | diy amateur |
| Who pictured | candidate |
| Symbols | us flag |
| Call to action | vote |
| Standout element | Facebook content-removed notice replacing the actual ad, exposing a policy compliance failure |
| Tactic | The ad leverages debate fatigue and voter disillusionment to position Jade Simmons as a unifying third-party alternative, though its persuasive reach is undermined by the platform removing it for a disclaimer violation. |
Where it ran (delivery by region)
| California | 13.7% |
| Texas | 13.1% |
| Florida | 4.6% |
| Georgia | 4.5% |
| New York | 4.4% |
| Virginia | 3.7% |
| Illinois | 3.6% |
Who saw it (delivery)
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 25-34 · male | 15.3% |
| 65+ · male | 1.8% |
| 45-54 · female | 9.0% |
| 55-64 · male | 1.9% |
| 18-24 · male | 2.4% |
| 35-44 · male | 12.5% |
| 25-34 · female | 19.1% |
| 45-54 · male | 5.8% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.3% |
| 35-44 · female | 21.4% |
| 18-24 · female | 2.1% |
| 55-64 · female | 4.6% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.7% |
| 18-24 · unknown | 0.2% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.4% |
| 65+ · female | 2.3% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.2% |
