Harriet Hageman US Inactive
Hageman for Wyoming
Ad copy
What in the world are historians going to call this Supreme Court? 🌎 Chief Justice Roberts has been so all over the map, ideologically, that it would be hard to call it the “Roberts Court.” They could try the “Thomas Court,” after the towering conservative who is its longest-serving justice. Or maybe the “Post-Ginsburg Court” after its famous liberal dissenter, who died last year. Or the “Breyer Court,” after its centrist liberal. 🔖 Why not, though, the “Hamburger Court”? This would be after the visionary law professor Philip Hamburger of Columbia University. He, so far as we’re aware, has never sat on any bench. Yet, in the closing weeks of this Supreme Court term, he is coming into view as potentially having a historic impact on American law. He is pressing his cause to rein in the runaway administrative state via not only his scholarly work but his founding, in 2017, of a new civil rights organization. It is called the New Civil Liberties Alliance. Read the rest of the article highlighting the firm, at which I serve as Senior Legal Council, at the link below. 👇 https://www.nysun.com/editorials/the-hamburger-court/91560/?fbclid=IwAR2h_7RhMwO3dkBo88IbYeFgXubhlT3rxJYOyVXNb3PyaIaOHOFYpx75wGQ
↗ View in Meta Ad Library (the live creative — image/video/layout)
Performance proxies
| Overall score | 37.7/100 |
| Spend / Reach / Long. / Eff. | 17.4 · 61.7 · 4.7 · 66.9 |
| Spend range | USD 200–299 |
| Impressions | 20,000 – 24,999 |
| CPM (≈ $/1k impr) | USD 11.09 |
| Est. audience size | 50,001 – 100,000 |
| Days live | 18 (2021-07-14 → 2021-08-01) |
| Created | 2021-07-14 |
| Creative variants | 1 body · 0 headline |
| Platforms | facebook, instagram |
| Languages | en |
| Candidate | WY — Harriet Hageman |
| Surfaced by | “senate:Harriet Hageman” |
🧠 AI analysis
| Issue | democracy elections |
| Framing | issue advocacy |
| Message type | awareness |
| Emotional appeal | pride |
| Production tier | semi pro |
| Who pictured | none |
| Symbols | capitol statue |
| Call to action | learn more |
| Standout element | dramatic dusk-lit Supreme Court building with two lone figures standing before it, evoking institutional gravitas |
| Tactic | The ad uses intellectual curiosity and constitutional framing to position Hageman as a serious legal thinker, building credibility with conservative legal audiences by engaging Supreme Court naming conventions and highlighting conservative justices. |
Where it ran (delivery by region)
| Wyoming | 100.0% |
Who saw it (delivery)
| 18-24 · unknown | 0.0% |
| 65+ · female | 22.8% |
| 65+ · unknown | 0.2% |
| 35-44 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 55-64 · female | 12.4% |
| 35-44 · female | 2.8% |
| 55-64 · male | 14.3% |
| 35-44 · male | 6.0% |
| 65+ · male | 20.3% |
| 55-64 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 45-54 · male | 9.2% |
| 18-24 · male | 0.7% |
| 45-54 · female | 5.3% |
| 25-34 · male | 3.6% |
| 25-34 · female | 1.5% |
| 18-24 · female | 0.4% |
| 45-54 · unknown | 0.1% |
| 25-34 · unknown | 0.1% |
